Electronics World articles Popular Electronics articles QST articles Radio & TV News articles Radio-Craft articles Radio-Electronics articles Short Wave Craft articles Wireless World articles Google Search of RF Cafe website Sitemap Electronics Equations Mathematics Equations Equations physics Manufacturers & distributors LinkedIn Crosswords Engineering Humor Kirt's Cogitations RF Engineering Quizzes Notable Quotes Calculators Education Engineering Magazine Articles Engineering software RF Cafe Archives Magazine Sponsor Links Saturday Evening Post NEETS EW Radar Handbook Microwave Museum About RF Cafe Aegis Power Systems Alliance Test Equipment Centric RF Empower RF ISOTEC Reactel RF Connector Technology San Francisco Circuits Anritsu Amplifier Solutions Anatech Electronics Axiom Test Equipment Conduct RF Copper Mountain Technologies Exodus Advanced Communications Innovative Power Products KR Filters LadyBug Technologies Rigol TotalTemp Technologies Werbel Microwave Windfreak Technologies Wireless Telecom Group Withwave Resources Vintage Magazines RF Cafe Software WhoIs entry for RF Cafe.com Thank you for visiting RF Cafe!




Please Support RF Cafe by purchasing my  ridiculously low−priced products, all of which I created.

RF Cascade Workbook for Excel

RF & Electronics Symbols for Visio

RF & Electronics Symbols for Office

RF & Electronics Stencils for Visio

RF Workbench

T-Shirts, Mugs, Cups, Ball Caps, Mouse Pads

These Are Available for Free

Espresso Engineering Workbook™

Smith Chart™ for Excel

High power RF measurement setup - RF Cafe Forums

The original RF Cafe Forums were shut down in late 2012 due to maintenance issues - primarily having to spend time purging garbage posts from the board. At some point I might start the RF Cafe Forums again if the phpBB software gets better at filtering spam.

Below are the old forum threads, including responses to the original posts.

-- Amateur Radio
-- Anecdotes, Gripes & Humor
-- Antennas
-- CAE, CAD, & Software
-- Circuits & Components
-- Employment & Interviews
-- Miscellany
-- Swap Shop
-- Systems
-- Test & Measurement
-- Webmaster

tmntRF
 Post subject: High power RF measurement setup
Posted: Thu Mar 08, 2007 10:57 am 
 
Captain
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 08, 2007 10:29 am
Posts: 10
Hello,

I am hoping i can get some information and advice about taking measurements at high power.

i am thinking of a kind of RF system that is like this:

a klystron delivering about 150kW power to a cavity via waveguides.
in between klystron and a circulator, i connect a directional coupler to couple power to measure the delivered power, and then another directional coupler between the circulator and cavity to couple power to measure the reflected power.

to measure reflected power from a cavity, maybe 1 to 3kW, would i connect an attenuator in between the cavity and reflectometer please? or are there reflectometers that take inputs at high power please?

I look forward to hear of any advice or info i could use to understand more about high power measurements, and make my setup more realistic.

thank you for your kind attention.

regards,
tmntRF


 
   
 
sm7ovk
 Post subject:
Posted: Mon Mar 12, 2007 4:31 am 
 
Captain
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 11, 2007 12:59 pm
Posts: 16
Hi,

normally you get this attenuation in the coupler - ie if you have a coupling factor of let say 60dB you will have a signal 60dB lower at your measuring output. In your example 150kW is the same as about 82dBm, with 60dB coupling you will have 22dBm to your powermeter. If this is to high you can easily attenuate it with a small attenuator - or choose a higher coupling factor.
Remember that you could be interested of a lower coupling factor for reflected power measurement since the reflected power, under normal conditions, is much lower than forward power.

Regards
Jens


 
   
 
tmntRF
 Post subject:
Posted: Mon Mar 12, 2007 6:56 am 
 
Captain
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 08, 2007 10:29 am
Posts: 10
sm7ovk wrote:
Hi,

normally you get this attenuation in the coupler - ie if you have a coupling factor of let say 60dB you will have a signal 60dB lower at your measuring output. In your example 150kW is the same as about 82dBm, with 60dB coupling you will have 22dBm to your powermeter. If this is to high you can easily attenuate it with a small attenuator - or choose a higher coupling factor.
Remember that you could be interested of a lower coupling factor for reflected power measurement since the reflected power, under normal conditions, is much lower than forward power.

Regards
Jens


Hi Jens,

Thank you for your reply and information.

May i ask, this coupler that you mentioned, it should be built-in inside commercially available power meters??

Regards,
Yi


 
   
 
sm7ovk
 Post subject:
Posted: Mon Mar 12, 2007 2:18 pm 
 
Captain
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 11, 2007 12:59 pm
Posts: 16
Hi,

no the coupler is a piece of waveguide that you have to place in line with your existing waveguide. You then connect your powermeter-sensor to the coupled output of the coupler.
As you mention the coupler for measuring output power could be placed before the circulator and the coupler for reflected power after the circulator - seen from the transmitter.
You don't mention the type of waveguide or frequency, but I'm sure that whatever the type there are couplers to buy.

Regards
Jens


 
   
 
tmntRF
 Post subject:
Posted: Mon Apr 02, 2007 11:21 am 
 
Captain
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 08, 2007 10:29 am
Posts: 10
Hi Jens, how are you?

May i further ask, does the attenuator, while attenuating the power level to a reasonable level for monitoring, effect the frequency of interest at all please? would a practical attenuator introduce reactances to the RF signal and then effects the frequency of the signal i would like to measure please?


 
   
 
sm7ovk
 Post subject:
Posted: Mon Apr 16, 2007 2:21 pm 
 
Captain
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 11, 2007 12:59 pm
Posts: 16
Hi tmntRF,

no a real attenuator made for high frequencies is purely resistive, (or at least in theory), it'll never affect your frequency.

You will have some mismatch, ie reactance, but most often this is so low you will not notice - if you use an attenuator made for RF frequencies. If you build your attenuator by yourself, it could be different of course.


Regards
Jens




Posted  11/12/2012

About RF Cafe

Kirt Blattenberger - RF Cafe Webmaster

Copyright: 1996 - 2024

Webmaster:

    Kirt Blattenberger,

    BSEE - KB3UON

RF Cafe began life in 1996 as "RF Tools" in an AOL screen name web space totaling 2 MB. Its primary purpose was to provide me with ready access to commonly needed formulas and reference material while performing my work as an RF system and circuit design engineer. The World Wide Web (Internet) was largely an unknown entity at the time and bandwidth was a scarce commodity. Dial-up modems blazed along at 14.4 kbps while tying up your telephone line, and a nice lady's voice announced "You've Got Mail" when a new message arrived...

Copyright  1996 - 2026

All trademarks, copyrights, patents, and other rights of ownership to images and text used on the RF Cafe website are hereby acknowledged.

All trademarks, copyrights, patents, and other rights of ownership to images and text used on the RF Cafe website are hereby acknowledged.

My Hobby Website: AirplanesAndRockets.com

My Daughter's Website: EquineKingdom