|
|
Poll: Which Presidential Candidate Will Be Best for Science? - RF
Cafe Forums
|
Which Presidential Candidate
Will Be Best for Science?
|
Hillary Clinton |
|
3% |
[ 1 ] |
Mike Huckabee |
|
3% |
[ 1 ] |
John McCain |
|
42% |
[ 13 ] |
Barak Obama |
|
26% |
[ 8 ] |
Write-In (who?) |
|
26% |
[ 8 ] |
|
Total
votes : 31 |
Kirt Blattenberger
|
Post subject: Which Presidential Candidate Will Be Best for Science?
Posted: Sun Feb 17, 2008 6:47 pm
|
|
|
Site Admin |
|
Joined: Sun Aug 03, 2003
2:02 pm Posts: 451 Location: Erie, PA
|
Greetings:
As the presidential campaigns
heat up here in the U.S., we hear a lot about what
kinds of social programs will be created anew or
fattened with more taxpayer money, but not much
at all about how basic scientific research, the
space program, alternative energy, visas for engineers,
or other such topics being discussed. Of course,
the reason is that none of them understand anything
about science, but do know a lot about how to tug
at heartstrings of the sheeple for how everybody
is being screwed by Big Business and needs Big Government
to rescue them.
Who do you believe will
do the best job of reviving the tech sector of the
U.S. economy? You do not need to sign in to vote
in the poll.
Your thoughts on the issue
are welcome here, but you will need to log in to
post an article (thank the scumbag spammers for
that).
_________________ - Kirt Blattenberger
RF Cafe Progenitor & Webmaster
|
|
|
|
|
Jose Arrina |
Post subject:
Posted: Mon Feb 18, 2008 11:14 am
|
|
|
Captain |
|
Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006
9:01 am Posts: 11 |
The whole lot of them are ignoramuses. Ron Paul
(a medical doctor and Air Force office) is the only
scientist among the original lineup, but he's out.
What degree does McCain have (I haven't looked it
up)? Didn't he crash 3 airplanes? Hillary - yikes!
Obama, seems like a nice guy, but wants to implement
full-fledged Socialism/Marxism. We're doomed.
- Jose'
_________________ ... Jose' Arrina
|
|
|
|
|
The Amplifier |
Post subject:
Posted: Mon Feb 18, 2008 9:32 pm
|
|
|
Captain |
|
Joined: Fri Jul 16, 2004
4:08 pm Posts: 5 |
Jose Arrina wrote:
What degree does McCain have (I haven't looked
it up)?
McCain graduated from the U.S. Naval Academy
in 1958 - not sure what the name of the degree is.
George Bush probably would have crashed
more planes than McCain did if he had had the nerve
to keep flying - after he let the taxpayers pay
for his training. Probably a good thing in retrospect.
Geo has been a real disappointment.
|
|
|
|
|
Jimmy Burrows |
Post subject:
Posted: Thu Feb 21, 2008 12:26 pm
|
|
Joined: Sat Aug 30, 2003
6:38 pm Posts: 6 Location: City of Industry,
CA |
I think McCain is the only one who appreciates and
understands the need to drive technoloy forward...
not just for iPhone as and wii boxes to pacify the
numbed multitudes, but for the sake of national
defense.
Hussein Obama is a typical rock star with
no knowledge of important matters. His cocaine usage
makes him popular with kids - a great role model,
eh? So we have Bill getting BJs in the Oval Office
and Obama doing cocaine (and a report out of him
doing the Congressman Larry Craig thing with a guy
in Minnesota back in 1999). Yeah, real presidential
material.
Hillary - give me a break. She's the most
hated woman on earth, even by her own party members.
|
|
|
|
|
troy |
Post subject:
Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2008 5:02 pm
|
|
|
Captain |
|
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2008
4:53 pm Posts: 8 |
I agree that McCain is probably the best among the
field of choices. The whole group is a joke. Huckabee
isn't even in the run, so forget him (not that he
would be a techie).
Obama wants to give
away everything we've got and spend all our GDP
on eradicating all the world's woes without realizing
that in doing so, he'll destroy us to the point
that we can't help anybody. His goal is to be every
nere-do-well's sugar daddy here and throughout all
the world.
We're doomed.
|
|
|
|
|
RFendor |
Post subject: McCain
Posted: Thu Mar 06, 2008 8:59 pm
|
|
|
Captain |
|
Joined: Tue Mar 04, 2008
7:43 pm Posts: 5 |
As a military veteran and a die hard traditional
conservative, for the second time in my life, I'm
not voting Republican out of disgust. I don't know
who I'm voting for - the choices are so sickening.
I don't see what you guys see in McCain,
IMHO, the guy is... well, he's just an idiot, that's
all I can say.
He basically said he's going
to continue the present neoconservative policy of
shipping US jobs and technology overseas under the
guise of free trade (deindustrializing the US, huge
trade deficit), giving amnesty to illegal immigrants
(have you forgotten his stance on that already?),
and sacrificing our sons and daughters in the name
of "spreading democracy" throughout the world (to
people who don't want it and hate us). Who's going
to pay for all this stuff anyhow? No traditional
conservative wants to see those policies continue,
and most engineers I know are traditional conservatives.
So who cares if he supports science and
technology a bit more then the next candidate? What
good is that when he's using our tax dollars to
fund research that he's just going to give tax breaks
to companies that ship it overseas anyhow?
The democrats are sounding more conservative
on that than the republicans. The lefties (neocons)
have taken over the republican party - and they
have the gall to call the democrats "liberals" -
just take a bird's eye view of what McCain is pushing.
If the distruction of the US industrial complex,
the use of the military as a world police force
and amnesty for illegal aliens are not liberal agenda,
then I don't know what are. The "Republican" label
no longer signifies traditional conservatism. Don't
vote that label out of blind faith - look at the
big picture.
|
|
Posted 11/12/2012
|
|
|